A clinical trial study to compare the efficacy of Conventional versus Preformed and 3D printed Band and Loop Space Maintainers

A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of conventional versus preformed and 3D printed band and loop space maintainers: A randomized control trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/05/068039

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K00- Disorders of tooth development anderuption

Interventions

Intervention1: Band and loop space maintainer: Group 1 - Conventional band and loop, Group 2 - Preformed band and loop and Group 3 - 3D printed band and loop space maintainer,we will compare group 1 v

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Grossly mutilated single molars on either side 2. Absence of abnormal dental conditions such as crossbite, open bite 3. Presence of antagonist tooth 4. Prematurely lost molar with major spacing or crowding disturbances in dentition 5. Child exhibiting co-operative behavior 6. Healthy teeth mesial and distal to the space

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Grossly carious abutment tooth 2. Absence of succedaneous tooth 3. Patient having any systemic disease

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
In this Clinical trial, we are comparing the evaluation of Conventional VS Preformed Vs 3D Printed Band & Loop Space maintainer along with survival time, gingival health and patient/ parent satisfaction over 6 months from baseline The expected outcome of this intervention will be to identify the best treatment modality for a specific condition and assess the sub conditional factors for its success rate.Timepoint: Follow up will be at day 1(baseline), 3 months, 6 months	—

Measure

Time frame

In this Clinical trial, we are comparing the evaluation of Conventional VS Preformed Vs 3D Printed Band & Loop Space maintainer along with survival time, gingival health and patient/ parent satisfaction over 6 months from baseline The expected outcome of this intervention will be to identify the best treatment modality for a specific condition and assess the sub conditional factors for its success rate.Timepoint: Follow up will be at day 1(baseline), 3 months, 6 months

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Shreya Kapoor

Swami Vivekanand Subharti University

drvivekrana11@gmail.com9412015029

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026