Skip to content

To study efficiency of patient specific 3D printed guides for lavage and lysis of temporomandibular joint compared to conventional method– A prospective clinical trial

Evaluation of arthrocentesis using 3d printed guide versus conventional arthrocentesis in the treatment of internal derangement with reduction of temporomandibular joint– A Randomised control trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/05/067932
Enrollment
14
Registered
2024-05-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M272- Inflammatory conditions of jaws Health Condition 2: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Arthrocentesis using 3D printed guides: 3D printed guides are patient-specific and made using software based on DICOM images of CT scans of individuals. This procedure will be performed

Sponsors

Dr Sandhya kokitkar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patient with internal derangement of TMJ with reduction of disc 2.Patients not responding to conservative therapy (Diet, pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, behavioural therapy, occlusal therapy) 3.Patients who are willing to participate in the study. 4.Patients with ASA I and ASA II.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with degenerative disorders of joint. (Osteoarthritis) 2.Patients with disc perforation. 3.rheumatoid arthritis/psoriatic arthritis 4.Patients with tenderness of TMJ secondary to myalgias or MPDS 5.Patient with history of Condylar fracture 6.Patient with excessive adipose tissue in facial region which will interfere with proper placement of patient specific guides. 7. Patients with severe systemic conditions. (ASA III And ASA IV) 8.Pregnant and lactating patient. 9.Patient with previous history of TMJ arthrocentesis, arthroscopy or surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Decrease the number of attempts thus avoiding multiple punctures, Minimal damage to TMJ and surrounding structures, Bridge the gap between arthroscopy and arthrocentesis Timepoint: outcomes will assisted intraoperatively,7th day, 1st month,3months 6months postoperative.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
complications of arthrocentesis using both techniqueTimepoint: outcomes will assisted intraoperatively,7th day, 1st month,3months 6months postoperative.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sandhya Kokitkar

Government Dental college and Hospital Mumbai

dr.kavitawadde@gmail.com9004799405

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026