Comparing the Fit of Temporary Dental Crowns: High-Tech Milled Acrylic vs. Traditional Acrylic

Evaluation of Occlusion using T-scan on provisional crowns fabricated from milled PMMA v/s Conventional acrylic resin: A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/05/067848

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-24

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: T-Scan with PMMA temporary crown: T-Scan with PMMA temporary crown at baseline, 1 week and 3 weeks Control Intervention1: T-Scan with conventional acrylic resin temporary crown: T-Scan

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients requiring bilateral single crowns, Patients requiring single crowns in molars, Minimum crown height 5 mm, Patients with good occlusion and absence of defects like attrition, abrasion, abfraction and erosion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: the exclusion criteria encompass periodontally compromised teeth, individuals who are pregnant or lactating, those with a history of systemic diseases or other debilitating conditions, individuals on steroids, anticoagulants, aspirin, or other drugs, patients with harmful oral habits, and those unwilling to give consent for the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
T-Scan for occlusal analysisTimepoint: T-Scan for occlusal analysis at baseline, 1 week and 3 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Amrutha Shenoy

Saveetha dental College and Hospitals

syncpooja1@gmail.com08369690620

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026