Comparison of different Laparoscopic methods for gall bladder removal

Three port verses standard Four port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/05/067740

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: Cholecystectomy: 3 port Laparoscopic Removal of Gall blabber Control Intervention1: Cholecystectomy: 4 port Laparoscopic Removal of Gall blabber

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All Cases of gallstone disease. Patients undergoing prophylactic laparoscopic cholecystectomy Patients of CBD stone treated with endoscopic removal and CBD stenting

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Empyema Of GB Jaundice Or Abnormal Liver Function Tests Cholangitis Portal Hypertension GB Carcinoma Enteric Fistula Patients Who Had Any Contraindications to Laparoscopic Surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparing rates of Operative, Intra operative and postoperative complications between Three port and Four port Laparoscopic cholecystectomyTimepoint: Assessment will be done within 4 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Duration of hospitalization post-surgery.Timepoint: Assessment will be done within 4 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRajesh Gattani

Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research

sakshigattani@gamil.com9373108181

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026