Skip to content

Analysis of Bone changes in patients rceving three differing implant designs

A Comparative Evaluation of Mean Crestal Bone Level Changes among Hydrophobic, Hydrophilic, and Laser Micro-Grooved Dental Implants Post 1 Year of Immediate Loading – A Randomised Clinical Control Trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/05/067565
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-05-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Test Group-1: Hydrophilic implants (SLA Active) will be placed in healthy individuals for management of edentulous sites in mandible clinical parameters will be evaluated at Baseline, 6

Sponsors

self funding
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male or female patients with age group between 25 to 60 years Patients not contraindicated for periodontal or implant surgery One bounded edentulous space ie a single tooth missing with intact proximal teeth primarily in the lower posteriors premolars and molars with sufficient bone quantity to allow implant placement Patients should be cooperative motivated and oral hygiene conscious Sufficient bone height at least 13mm and sufficient bone width at least 6mm should be present Presence of local factors without signs of clinical inflammation Stable occlusion with no para functional habits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of active periodontal disease at the time of implant surgery Patients who did not accept to comply for 1 year follow-up were excluded from the study Patient diagnosed with known systemic diseases Bone disorders like hyperparathyroidism osteoporosis or Pagets disease Patients who are under steroids antiinflammatory and bisphosphonates in the past 6 months Patients who are treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapeutic agents. Chronic alcoholics or drug abuse Smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Crestal bone level changes in mm to be assessed at Baseline and 1 year with standardized Intra oral periapical radiographs in Control SLA and Test groups SLA-Active and LMGI Implant survival rates in percentage to be assessed at 1 year with radiographic and clinical assessment between Control SLA and Test groups SLA Active and LMGI Timepoint: subjects will be followed at baseline, 6 months and 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the Relative position of gingival margin in mm at the implant site of Control SLA and Test groups SLA-Active and LMGI at Baseline 6 months and 1 year post loading To assess the Implant stability quotient ISQ values using resonance frequency analysis RFA during Immediate Loading protocol Timepoint: subjects will be followed at baseline, 6 months and 1 year

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr PSG Prakash

SRM Dental College, Ramapuram

akashpsg@gmail.com9840870990

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026