To compare the safety of insertion of protector lma and igel lma in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia

Comparison of insertion parameters of LMA protector and I-gel supraglottic airway device in adults undergoing general anaesthesia - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/05/067515

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: To compare insertion parameters with Protector LMA and I-gel supraglottic airway devices in adults undergoing general anaesthesia: Group 1-insertion of device protector lma intraorally

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Consenting adult patients 2. Aged 18 – 60 yrs. 3. ASA (American society of anaesthesiologists) grade I and II 4. Posted for elective surgery under general anaesthesia. 5. Modified Mallampati (MMP) grade I and II patients. 6. Patients having full range of neck movements

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A) Any cervical spine disease / fixation / operation B) Mouth opening less = 2 finger width of patients C) Facial anomalies maxillary hypoplasia, mandibular hypoplasia / hyperplasia D) TMJ pathology- ankylosis or reduced movement E) Microstomia F) Tumors of mouth and tongue G) Macroglossia . H) Teeth problems - edentulous, loose teeth, protruding upper incisors. I) Pharynx pathology – hypertrophied tonsils adenoids, J) Larynx Pathology- epiglottitis, laryngomalacia, tumor, congenital stenosis K) Surgery involving oral cavity or throat.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare insertion time of protector LMA and I-gel supraglottic airway device in adults undergoing general anaesthesiaTimepoint: 1 YEAR	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the rate of successful insertion in first attempt, number of attempts required for successful insertion, requirement of external manipulation and occurrence of complications between protector LMA and I-gel patient groups, including laryngospasm, bronchospasm, regurgitation / aspiration.Timepoint: 1 YEAR	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ravinder kaur

Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and ResearchBathinda

ravinpandher87@gmail.com9872474235

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026