Comparison between two different bone materials for preservation of bone after dental extraction

Comparative Clinical, Radiological & Histological Evaluation of Autogenous Particulate Dentin Graft vs Allograft For Socket Preservation : A Randomized Clinical Trial - nil

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/05/067426

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Socket preservation using Autogenous particulate Dentin graft: Clinical, Radiological and Histological Evaluation of Autogenous Particulate Dentin graft fo

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients aged between 20 and 50 years. 2.Systemically healthy patients. 3.Patients who have indication for dental extraction in mandibular posteriors 4.Post extraction socket classification of Type A (Smith and Tarnow 2013)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient exhibiting with periapical infection in tooth planned for socket preservation. 2. Mandibular third molar to be excluded 3.Pregnant and lactating women. 4.Smokers (Current/Past) 5.Patients with known documented allergy to DFDBA, Sodium Hydroxide 6.Patients with Full mouth Plaque Score = 20 % after phase I therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare autogenous dentin graft with Allograft ( DFDBA) in Socket preservation Clinical , Radiographical and HistilogicalTimepoint: Base line- Clinical and Radiological evaluation 3 months - Clinical evaluation 6 months - Clinical, Radiological& Histological evaluation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. To clinically assess the changes in bucco-lingual width of socket at crestal lines 2. To radiographically assess the change in bucco-lingual width of the edentulous area at the crestal level pre and post surgically using CBCT. 3. To radiographically assess the change in bucco-lingual width of the edentulous area at the mid buccal level pre and post surgically using CBCT. 4. To radiographically assess the change in height of edentulous area pre and post surgically using CBCT. 5. To histologically assess the new bone formation at 6 months post socket preservation. Timepoint: Base line , 03 months and 06 months	—

Measure

Time frame

1. To clinically assess the changes in bucco-lingual width of socket at crestal lines 2. To radiographically assess the change in bucco-lingual width of the edentulous area at the crestal level pre and post surgically using CBCT. 3. To radiographically assess the change in bucco-lingual width of the edentulous area at the mid buccal level pre and post surgically using CBCT. 4. To radiographically assess the change in height of edentulous area pre and post surgically using CBCT. 5. To histologically assess the new bone formation at 6 months post socket preservation. Timepoint: Base line , 03 months and 06 months

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactCol T Prasanth

Army Dental Center(Research and Referral),New Delhi

tprasanthavin@gmail.com8284851155

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026