Skip to content

comparison of effectiveness of two spinal anaesthetic (bupuvacaine, ropivacaine) drugs in cesarean section

Effectiveness of injection hyperbaric ropivacaine(0.75%) with injection hyperbaric bupivacaine(0.5%) in lower segment cessarian section under spinal anesthesia; randomized double blind controlled trial - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/05/067300
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-05-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring

Interventions

Intervention1: INJECTION HYPERBARIC ROPIVACAINE(0.75%): ropivacaine heavy(0.75%) 2.2cc in subarachnoid space and observed till the recovery of motor and sensory and achieving analgesic effect (VAS sco

Sponsors

Keerthana
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing cesarean section and with ASA Grade I/II/III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of allergy to local anaesthetic to study drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in hemodynamic parameters- heart rate, Mean arterial pressure, spo2Timepoint: pre-op, 0mins, 5min, 10mins , 15mins,etc upto end of c-section

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
onset,peak & duration of Sensory & motor blockade, time of ambulation, total duration of analgesia,any adverse effectsTimepoint: Post induction & Post operative period till 24 hrs

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKeerthana

government medical college,bhavnagar

dr.chandrika62@gmail.com9427040221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026