Comparison of dental impression techniques in children

To compare digital and conventional impression techniques in terms of comfort time and accuracy - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/05/066991

Enrollment

Registered

2024-05-08

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Digital intraoral scanner: Digital intraoral scanner that is iscan pro scanner Control Intervention1: Digital intraoral scanner and alginate impression material: Digital intraoral scann

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children with class 1 ASA status Frankl behaviour rating 3 and 4 Requiring impressions for appliances and study models No history of previous impressions taken

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with presence of swelling Children whose parents did not give consent and did not participate in study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare digital and conventional impression techniques in terms of comfort ,time and accuracyTimepoint: once	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Digital impression can be an alternative to conventional impression methodTimepoint: 3 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMAYURI GORULE

D Y Patil school of dentistry Navi Mumbai

mayurigorule97@gmail.com09035494120

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026