Skip to content

Comparison of three methods of pre oxygenation - a randomised controlled trial

Denitrogenation: comparison of three methods of preoxygenation - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/05/066963
Enrollment
69
Registered
2024-05-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: 4 room air vital capacity breaths followed by preoxygenation: General Electronics Avance CS2 work station with circle breathing system having a 2L capacity reservoir bag will be used. P

Sponsors

St Johns National Academy of Health Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults (ages 18-50) Both sexes ASA grade I and II Elective surgeries under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Recent respiratory infection Chronic smokers Asthmatics Anticipated difficult airway Pregnant women BMI more than 30kg/m2 Cardiac/respiratory diseases Patients who do not consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total time taken, number of breaths to reach EtO2 of 0.9Timepoint: 0,1,2,3 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of breaths required to reach EtO2 of 0.9Timepoint: 0,30s,1min,1.5 min, 2 min, 2.5 min, 3 min

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKavya Pinto

St John’s National academy of health sciences

drsavitha_ks@yahoo.com9844638121

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026