Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of itraconazole, SUBA-itraconazole and voriconazole in Recalcitrant Dermatophytosis.

Comparative efficacy and safety of itraconazole, SUBA-itraconazole, and voriconazole in the treatment of recalcitrant dermatophytosis – A randomized, open label, active comparator clinical trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/05/066681
Enrollment
54
Registered
2024-05-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: B358- Other dermatophytoses

Interventions

Intervention1: ITRACONAZOLE: 200 MG OD, given per oral for a period of 8 weeks Control Intervention1: VORICONAZOLE: 400 MG OD, given per oral for a period of 8 weeks. Control Intervention2: SUBA-ITRAC

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with recalcitrant dermatophytosis (persistent disease with duration ranging 6 months to 1 year / encountered reoccurrence of the disease within = 6 weeks of completion of the treatment) of either sex between 18-70 years of age. 2. Patient willing to participate in the study by giving informed written consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with known hypersensitivity / contraindications to azole group of drugs. 2. Patients currently on any other antifungal medications (systemic/topical). 3. Patients on topical corticosteroid therapy in the past two weeks. 4. Patients on/ requiring prolonged therapy with proton pump inhibitors. 5. Patients with pulmonary/extrapulmonary tuberculosis on treatment with anti-tubercular drug regimen involving rifampicin. 6. Patients with concomitant therapy with carbamazepine, phenobarbitone, phenytoin. 7. Patients on HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors like simvastatin, lovastatin. 8. Patients with baseline ALT more than 3 times of upper limit of normal level. 9. Patients on systemic immunosuppressive drugs and immunocompromised patients such as HIV positive/ post-renal transplant. 10. Patients with known heart failure or on any drugs for cardiac arrhythmias 11. Pregnant and lactating females. 12. Patients with history of lactose intolerance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
•Proportion of patients showing complete cure ( clinical + mycological) at the end of 8 weeks of therapy. -Clinical cure is defined as Score - 0 in Total Symptom Score.16 -Mycological cure is defined as negative KOH mount at the end of 8 weeks of therapyTimepoint: 8 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events. 2. Proportions of patients showing clinical cure or mycological cure at the end of 8 weeks of therapy 3. Proportion of patients remaining relapse free for 3 months after 8 weeks of therapy (only in case of completely cured patients). 4. Correlation of drug levels in plasma and sebum with Total Symptom Score at week-4 & 8. 5. Correlation of Serum IL-17 and IgE levels with respect to Total Symptom Score at the end of therapy. 6. Correlation of population pharmacokinetics with the Total Symptom Score at the end of therapy. Timepoint: 8 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMAHESH KUMAR B

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

nusrat.shafiq.pgi@gmail.com9478000822

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026