Skip to content

Comparing two therapies for knee arthritis: Tool-based tissue therapy versus Vibration massage

Effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization versus percussive massage therapy on myofascial pain, mobility, and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized clinical trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/05/066581
Enrollment
68
Registered
2024-05-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M179- Osteoarthritis of knee, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization: The IASTM tool will be placed in 45 degrees and the area will be scanned superficially for densified areas or taut bands or trigger points

Sponsors

Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation College of Physiotherapy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with K/L Grade 2 & 3 knee osteoarthritis and ACR criteria for knee osteoarthritis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Recent surgery or fracture of the lower extremity 2. Severe osteoporosis 3. Open wounds, muscle ruptures, tendon ruptures 4. Tumors 5. Vascular disorders (for eg. varicose veins), Neurological deficits or movement disorders 6. Patient taking anticoagulant medications 7. Patients having pacemaker or implants inserted 8. Directly over bony prominences (for eg: over patella) 9. Patients with sensitive skin 10. Patients who are on any muscle relaxants during treatment duration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 2. Goniometer 3. Timed Up and Go test 4. 30 Sec Chair Rise test 5. Western Ontario and McMaster (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index- CRD Version 6. Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) 7. Global Rating of Change (GROC)Timepoint: At baseline (0 weeks) and after intervention (after 3 weeks)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBhakti Chavda

Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation College of Physiotherapy

sona.sarma@gmail.com9371004121

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026