Comparing Double Y plate with Miniplates in treatment of lower jaw fractures.

Comparative Assessment of Double-Y shaped versus conventional Miniplates in fixation of Mandibular Fractures - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/066568

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified Health Condition 2: S026- Fracture of mandible

Interventions

Intervention1: Double-Y shaped titanium plate: Orthomax Pvt Ltd Duration - 6 months Control Intervention1: Conventional titanium miniplatez: Provided from college Duration - 6 months

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with recent mandibular fractures. Dentate or partially edentulous. Patients who give their consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Infected fracture sites or wounds. Comminuted fractures. Presence of osseous pathology. Patients unfit forvundergoing treatment under general anesthesia. Patients with systemic disorders that affect bone healing. Patients undergoing radiotherapy or Chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Wound Problems ( cellulitis, purulence, dehiscence of the incision, plate exposure, granulation tissue at incision)Timepoint: 2months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
pain,neurosensory dysfunction, clinical union of fractured segmentsTimepoint: 4months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSwastika Srivastava

Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Pallikaranai

drbalakrishnanomfs@gmail.com9765190045

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026