Skip to content

3D Printed VS Conventional Occlusal Splint for Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.

Comparison of 3D Printed Occlusal Splint Versus Conventional Occlusal Splint in Treating Temporomandibular Joint Disorder Utilizing Advanced Digital Assessment Techniques - A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/04/066457
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-04-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: 3D Printed Occlusal splint: Occlusal splint fabricated using 3D printing technology using denture base resin used for 3 weeks Control Intervention1: Conventional Occlusal Splint: Occlus

Sponsors

Saveetha Dental College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Participants between the ages of 18 and 65 years. 2.Participants with disc displacement. 3.Participants with generalized dental attrition or loss of VDO or sensitivity due to loss of occlusal enamel. 4.Patient with full arch dentition. 5.No active periodontal disease. 6.Participants with good general health. 7.Participants who have given written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Participants with a known allergy to Polymethylmethacrylate. 2.Participants with systemic diseases affecting the oral cavity, such as uncontrolled diabetes, autoimmune diseases, or cancer. 3.Patient with impacted, partially erupted third molars. 4.Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 5.Participants with a history of mental illness or cognitive impairment. 6.Participants with history of recent multiple teeth extractions. 7.Participants with a history of severe periodontal disease or tooth mobility. 8.Participants with missing teeth that require immediate restoration. 9.Participants who are unable to comply with the study protocol or attend follow-up visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual Analogue scale (VAS)Timepoint: Baseline, 3 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Chair TimeTimepoint: Insertion day;Joint Vibration Analysis (JVA)Timepoint: Baseline, 3 weeks;T Scan evaluationTimepoint: Baseline, 3 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmrutha Shenoy

Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals

Amruthashenoyd.sdc@saveetha.com8308419570

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026