Comparison between Self etching primer and conventional acid etching technique with the effectiveness of pumice prophylaxis in orthodontic bonding

A prospective RCT for the comparison between Self etching primer and conventional acid etching technique with the effectiveness of the pumice prophylaxis in orthodontic bonding. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/066432

Enrollment

400

Registered

2024-04-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: conventional acid etching technique with the use of pumice prophylaxis with use of Aster Prophy Pumice Prophylaxis paste, 3M ESPE scotchbondâ?¢ etchant, 3Mâ?¢ Transbondâ?¢ XT Light Cure

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with good oral hygiene. Patients required fixed mechanotherapy therapy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Enamel hypoplasia and demineralization. Fluorosis of teeth. Teeth with restoration on labial/buccal surface. Teeth with prosthesis.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
NUMBER OF BOND FAILURETimepoint: 6 months 9 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Chairside time requiredTimepoint: After bonding	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHarshkumar Gandhi

Faculty of dental science, Dharmsinh Desai University

aakash1172@gmail.com9825373777

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026