Comparision of different methods to initiate cervical changes before labour.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Dilapan-S vs Dinoprostone Gel for ripening of cervix prior to induction of labour-A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/066341

Enrollment

212

Registered

2024-04-25

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O00-O9A- Pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium

Interventions

Intervention1: Dilapan-S: Participants will be randomized between Group A (Dilapan-S)and Group B (Dinoprostone gel) at KLES DR Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belagavi.Cervical ri

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Singleton pregnancy 2)Term gestation (37-42 weeks) 3)Cephalic presentation 4)Reactive admission NST 5)Bishop score less than or equal to 6 6)Intact Membranes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Previous Lower Segment Cesarean Section 2)Contra-indications of prostaglandins and Vaginal delivery 3)Malpresentation 4)Already diagnosed Mullerian anomalies 5)Hypersensitivity to Prostaglandins and Mifepristone 7)Active Vaginal infections. 8)Placental abnormalities (low lying Placenta)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To determine the efficacy of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator (DILAPAN-S) vs Dinoprostone vaginal gel for cervical ripening in induction of labourTimepoint: Baseline (48-72 hours)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To determine fetomaternal outcomeTimepoint: Baseline (48-72 hours)	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShridevi Metgud

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE University

shridevi.metgud@gmail.com7353195431

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026