Comparative Evaluation Of two different preventive measures in second permanent molars.

Comparative Evaluation Of Fluoride Varnish and Etching Sealant in preventing dental caries in newly erupted Permanent Molars -An in vivo study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Observational

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/066117

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Prevent Seal: Topical application will be done following light cure and evaluation would be done after 6 and 12 months Control Intervention1: Embrace Fluoride varnish: Topical applicati

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients in the age group of 11-14 years. 2. ASA – I and ASA – II Patients. 3. Newly erupted permanent second molars with ICDAS 1 & 2. 4. Molars with occlusal surface fully visible 5. Patients who are compliant. 6. Parents who are willing to give their consent for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Children with oral habits like bruxism. 2. Children undergoing orthodontic treatment. 3. Previously filled sealants or restorations. 4. Any developmental defects. 5. Children with special health care needs.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
the outcome will be assessed at 6 months and 12 monthsTimepoint: the outcome will be assessed at 6 months and 12 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Retention of the sealant will be assessed using Simonsen’s criteria.Timepoint: 6 and 12 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrAditya Saxena

ITS DENTAL COLLEGE,HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE

adisaxen85@gmail.com8527969884

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026