Assessing the fit, aesthetics, and patient preference of temporary crowns fabricated using two different fabrication techniques.

Comparing Conventional and Digital Temporary Workflows for Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Clinical Fit, Esthetic Scores, and Patient Preference. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/066073

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-22

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional workflow: mock tooth preparation is done on diagnostic cast and temporary crowns are fabricated in the laboratory, which is then relined chair side in the patients mouth af

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients with complaint of single missing tooth requiring replacement with fixed dental prosthesis in upper anterior tooth region

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients with systemic illnesses, uncontrolled diabetes, poor oral hygiene, smokers, pregnant, lactating women

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
clinical fit of the crownsTimepoint: 0, 1, 2 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time efficiency, esthetic scores, patient preferencesTimepoint: At baseline (immediately post clinical procedure)	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Amrutha Shenoy

Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals

subhabratamaiti.sdc@saveetha.com9916675624

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026