Analysing how well the BRIUS® appliance works compared to traditional Labial and Lingual braces – using computer modeling and real-world testing to see which one is better.

Analysing the Efficacy of BRIUS® Appliance in comparison to Conventional Labial and Lingual Appliance – A Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Validation - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/066072

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-22

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: BRIUS®: Finite element analysis will be done to assess the biomechanical efficiency of the appliance and dental, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes will be assessed clinically since

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Class I bimaxillary protrusion cases requiring 1st premolar extraction with mild crowding cases (less than 5mm) Good gingival and periodontal health status

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Periodontally compromised patient Craniofacial disorder Patient with any systemic disease Moderate to severe crowding (more than 5mm)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To assess biomechanical efficiency of BRIUS® using FEM analysis in Class I bimaxillary protrusion cases, requiring all 1st premolar extractionsTimepoint: TO-Before treatment T1-After treatment (12-18months)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To assess biomechanical efficiency of BRIUS® using FEM analysis in Class I bimaxillary protrusion cases, requiring all 1st premolar extractionsTimepoint: TO-Before treatment T1-After treatment (12-18months);To assess patient complianceTimepoint: Mid treatment;To assess the clinical changes in dental and dentoalveolar parameters with BRIUS® appliance when compared to the conventional Labial and Lingual appliance in Class I bimaxillary protrusion cases, requiring all 1st premolar extractionsTimepoint: TO-Before treatment T1-After treatment (12-18months);To assess the soft tissue changes with BRIUS® appliance when compared to the Conventional Labial and Lingual appliance in Class I bimaxillary protrusion cases, requiring all 1st premolar extractionsTimepoint: TO-Before treatment T1-After treatment (12-18months)	—

Measure

Time frame

To assess biomechanical efficiency of BRIUS® using FEM analysis in Class I bimaxillary protrusion cases, requiring all 1st premolar extractionsTimepoint: TO-Before treatment T1-After treatment (12-18months);To assess patient complianceTimepoint: Mid treatment;To assess the clinical changes in dental and dentoalveolar parameters with BRIUS® appliance when compared to the conventional Labial and Lingual appliance in Class I bimaxillary protrusion cases, requiring all 1st premolar extractionsTimepoint: TO-Before treatment T1-After treatment (12-18months);To assess the soft tissue changes with BRIUS® appliance when compared to the Conventional Labial and Lingual appliance in Class I bimaxillary protrusion cases, requiring all 1st premolar extractionsTimepoint: TO-Before treatment T1-After treatment (12-18months)

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abhita Malhotra

Manav Rachna Dental College

drpuneetbatra@gmail.com9810335961

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026