Accuracy evaluation of guided Mini Screw placement

Comparative evaluation of accuracy of IZC implant placement using Navident system and Manual method- A Randomised control trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/066067

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-22

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Dynamic navigation for IZC placement: Navident software was used to place IZC after bone mapping the area using CBCt and evalunav software was used to check the accuracy of implant plac

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient who require IZC implant placement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Restricted mouth opening patients 2.Heavy smokers 3.Intake of bisphosphonates 4.Pregnant woman 5.Maxillary sinusitis 6.Alcohol or drug abuse 7.Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus 8.Patients with infectious disease such as hepatitis and AIDS

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Accuracy of mini implant placement using four parameters which are Entry deviation, Apex deviation(2D) and Apex deviation(3D) and Angular deviationTimepoint: In this trial the primary outcome was assessed immediately after placement (T0) - baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time taken for calibration of the equipment to mini implant placement (TO) in seconds.Timepoint: In this trial the secondary outcome was assessed immediately after placement (T0) - baseline	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRavindra Kumar Jain

Saveetha Dental College

ravindrakumar@saveetha.com9884729660

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026