Comparison between endoscopic and microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.

A Study to compare functional outcomes of Microscopic versus Endoscopic type 1 Tympanoplasty. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/065726

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Endoscopic Type 1 tympanoplasty: In endoscopic tympanoplasty, a zero degree, rigid endoscope with camera and monitor will be used. Temporalis fascia graft will be harvested through a 2–

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed cases of COM mucosal in age group 18-65 yrs, with Central perforations , consenting for surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Pregnant patients,smoker, known diabetic, any other comorbidities -COM squamosal. -Large Central perforation, subtotal or total perforations -Patient with Active ear discharge. - Patient with suspected ossicular discontinuity or fixation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
We hope to get – Good success rate after endoscopic Tympanoplasty in terms of graft uptake and hearing improvement . Less intraoperative and post operative pain.Timepoint: Follow up at 3 months and 6 months period after surgery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Shivangi Patnecha

All India institute of medical sciences AIIMS, Raipur

renurajguru@yahoo.com9784081123

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026