Study of implant site preparation compairing the use of peizosurgery and conventional drills in terms of time, bone density and stability.

Comparative study of Piezosurgery and conventional drill for implant site preparation. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/065652

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Piezosurgery implant drills: Peizosurgery implant drills using Piezoelectric device for implant site preparation and to compare the time of operation, bone density and implant stability

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: subjects with missing mandibular anterior and posterior teeth

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects who are smokers subjects with poor oral hygiene Uncontrolled systemic disease Presence of bone pathology within the furture osteotomy site.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.Implant primary stability at the time of implant placement and 3 months using ISQ values. 2. Bone density preoperatively and after 3 months around the implant using the gray scale values of cbct. Timepoint: Baseline and 3 months.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Comparative analysis of operation time in minutes.Timepoint: Baseline & 3 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSWATHY SRIDHAR

Government Dental College

girishgiraddi@gmail.com9740098199

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026