3D plates and conventional miniplates in treatment of mandibular fractures .

Comparative evaluation of 3d Locking Plates, 3d Non-locking plates, Locking and Non- locking Conventional Miniplates in the treatment of Mandibular fractures. - nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/065628

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-12

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: 3D Locking Miniplates: 3D locking miniplates will be used in the participants having mandibular fractures. The participants will be assessed for occlusion, fracture stability, pain , pa

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All clinically and radiographically confirmed mandibular fractures. Healthy subject ASA-1&2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medically compromised subject ASA-3& 4. Edentulous subject. Subject with comminuted fractures. Subjects not able to come for follow up and those who do not give consent to be part of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Occlusion : Present or absent Fracture stability : By checking interfragmentary mobility manually. Pain : Based on VASTimepoint: At baseline 3rd day 15th day 1 month	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Paresthesia Infection Operating time Screw loosening Wound dehiscenceTimepoint: At baseline 3rd day 15th day 1 month	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Girish Giraddi

Government Dental College And Research Institute, Bangalore

girishgiraddi@gmail.com9740098199

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026