Skip to content

Assessment of failure rate of 3Dprinted fixed retainers

Comparison of failure rate between CAD/CAM generated and conventional multi-stranded fixed lingual bonded retainer :A prospective single blinded randomized controlled trial - Nill

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/04/065087
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-04-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K050- Acute gingivitis

Interventions

Intervention1: 3D printed fixed lingual retainer fabricated using Computer aided designing/Computer aided machining (CAD/CAM): Computer aided designing/Computer aided machining (CAD/CAM) fabricated fi

Sponsors

A . Sornambiga
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Completion of treatment with full fixed appliance with optimal overjet and overbite, occlusions according to the six keys of Andrews. 2. Good general and oral health

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Treatment involving extraction of anterior teeth 2. Conditions contraindicating fixed retainers 3. Craniofacial or severe asymmetry syndromes 4. History of periodontal disease 5. Dental restorations or missing teeth on the anterior area 6. Previous anterior fixed retainer placement 7. History of Nickel hypersensitivity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Failure rate of CAD/CAM and conventional fixed bonded retainer in orthodontic treated patientTimepoint: The following time points were defined over the study period of 6 months: (1) T0: bonding of the lingual fixed retainer (2) T1: 1 months after T0 (3) T2: 3 months after T0 (4) T3: 6 months after T0 (end of the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Gingival health between the use of CAD/CAM and conventional fixed bonded retainer in orthodontic treated patient.Timepoint: The following time points were defined over the study period of 6 months: (1) T0: bonding of the lingual fixed retainer (2) T1: 1 months after T0 (3) T2: 3 months after T0 (4) T3: 6 months after T0 (end of the study)

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactA Sornambiga

Indiragandhi institute of dental science

pavithranandammayappan@igids.ac.in9443183590

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026