Skip to content

Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/04/065074
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-04-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: NEEDLESS PRESSURE INJECTION: Needle-free jet injection delivers local anesthetic as a high-speed stream and it is considered a promising way to possibly overcome needle-phobia and denta

Sponsors

MGM dental college and hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients in the age group 18-60 years. Both Male and Female patients. Patients indicated for extractions of single tooth which can be extracted using infiltration technique

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known allergy to amide type of local anesthetic agent Patients having active local infections, abscess or any other lesion at the injection site. Patients with systemic co-morbidities that would preclude administration of local anesthesia or adrenaline (eg- disorders of liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, etc.) or are contraindication of extraction. Patients taking medications such as anticoagulant Alcohol consumption 48 hours before of study. Patients not willing to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare the Anesthetic efficacy using needleless pressure injection technique and conventional injection technique during dental extraction using infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 AdrenalineTimepoint: Immediate after 7 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate & compare the Anesthetic efficacy using needleless pressure injection technique & conventional injection technique during dental extraction using infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 AdrenalineTimepoint: Immediate after 7 days

Countries

India

Contacts

Public Contactdr Adil gandevivala

MGM dental college and hospital

dr.adilg@gmail.com9096815606

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026