supraglottic airway device after insertion in adult patient undergoing elective laproscopic surgery

Comparison of clinical performance of LMA proseal and LMA blockbuster in adult patient undergoing elective laproscopic surgery: prospective randomized controlled study - NA

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/04/064963

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: LMA PROSEAL and LMA BLOCKBUSTER: Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA BLOCKBUSTER and LMA Proseal after 10 mins of pneumoperitoneum Control Intervention1: LMA BLOCKBUSTER an

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of either sex aged 18-60 years ASA grade I-II patients Modified mallampti I & II Patients giving written informed consent will be taken

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients not giving consent Obesity (BMI >30) Pregnant Reduced mouth opening Restrictive lung disease Any associated cardiological, neurological disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Oropharyngeal leak pressure after 10 minutes of pneumoperitoneum just before start of surgeryTimepoint: Oropharyngeal leak pressure after 10 minutes of pneumoperitoneum just before start of surgery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time of insertion Ease of insertion Requirement of airway maneuver Complications Other ventilator parameters Timepoint: 10 mins after pneumoperitoneum insufflation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Tanmay Tiwari

King Georges Medical University Lucknow

tanmayanesthesia@gmail.com9452526270

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026