FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the impact of two different designs of dental implants on how stable they are when used in a procedure where they are immediately loaded for function.

Evaluation of the Effect of Two Different Implant Thread Designs on Implant Stability in Immediate Functional Loading Protocol - A Randomized Control Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/064899
Enrollment
26
Registered
2024-03-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified Health Condition 2: K069- Disorder of gingiva and edentulousalveolar ridge, unspecified

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Neodent Implants: Implants with trapezoidal thread design, 6 month follow up trial Control Intervention2: ReFirm implants: A newly introduced implant system with dynamic thread

Sponsors

Janvi Kalra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients presenting with single missing posterior tooth in mandibular arch. Patients within the age group of 20-45 years of either sex. Patients with D2 bone quality (850-1250 Hounsfield Units). Patients with Insertion Torque value = 30 Ncm at baseline. Patients with sufficient vertical inter arch space to accommodate the prosthetic component.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having known history of bone disorders (e.g. osteoporosis, osteoarthritis). Patients having known systemic diseases contraindicated for implant placement. Patients with a history of smoking. Patients with a history of drug intake such as immunosuppressive drugs, anticoagulants and anti-cancer drugs three months prior to the study. Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Pregnant and lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate implant stability quotient in Dynamic Progressive implant thread design (Neodent® Helix GM® Implants) in functionally loaded implants at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-loading. To evaluate implant stability quotient in Optimized implant thread design (IntEssence Refirm® Implants) in functionally loaded implants at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-loading. To compare the implant stability quotient values obtained in Dynamic Progressive implant thread design and Optimized implant thread design in functionally loaded implants at baseline, 3 months and 6 months post-loading. Timepoint: baseline, 3 months, 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
N/ATimepoint: N/A—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactJanvi Kalra

Manav Rachna International institute of Research and Studies

dhawan.sds@mrei.ac.in9810050104

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026