Skip to content

Comparison between non channeled blade with channeled blade of videolaryngoscope for securing the airway

A randomized controlled, comparative study of intubation success rate between channeled Vs non channeled blade of Hugmed videolaryngoscope for orotracheal intubation. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/064685
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-03-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: A randomized controlled, comparative study of intubation success rate between between channeled Vs non channeled blade of Hugmed videolaryngoscope for orotracheal intubation: Comparison

Sponsors

Seth GSMC and KEMH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patient of either sex of age group 18-60yr 2.Undergoing elective surgery under General anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation 3. ASA I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient with difficult airway- mouth opening less than 2, restricted neck extension, neck swelling. 2. Emergency surgery 3.Increase risk of gastric content, regurgitation or aspiration.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison between the channeled and non-channeled blade of Hugmed video laryngoscopes with respect to rate of successful intubation in first attempt. Timepoint: Comparison between the channeled and non-channeled blade of Hugmed video laryngoscopes with respect to rate of successful intubation in first attempt.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome includes: 1. Time-for-visualization of glottis 2. Time for intubation 3. Numbers of attempts 4. Percentage of Glottis Opening(POGO) score. 5. Ease of use of the video laryngoscopes. 7. Complications during intubation. 8. Difficulties during intubation. 9.Use of adjuncts .manipulationTimepoint: 3 times will be measure in this study during orotracheal intubation: 1.Time from oral insertion of the videolaryngoscope until clear recognition of the glottis opening on the videolaryngoscope. 2.Time from recognition of glottis vision to black line of endotracheal tube beyond vocal cord(T2). 3.Time from black line of endotracheal tube beyond vocal cord till confirmation of intubation by auscultation and capnography(T3).

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shivani Patil

Seth G S medical College Parel Mumbai

devalkarpriti@gmail.com9769934980

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026