Skip to content

A Clinical Study to compare the treatment outcome Of Microsurgical Endodontics with and without real time guide in Endodontics

TREATMENT OUTCOME OF MICROSURGICAL ENDODONTICS TREATED WITH DYNAMIC NAVIGATION IN COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL APPROACH IN PATIENTS WITH LESIONS OF ENDODONTIC ORIGIN - RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY - MISGE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/064556
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-03-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K045- Chronic apical periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Endodontic Microsurgery performed with real time guide using dynamic navigation: The patient will be evaluated for a period of 1year Control Intervention1: Endodontic Microsurgery perfo

Sponsors

Dr Vivek Hegde
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Teeth diagnosed with Periapical lesion of category A B and C according to Kim and Kratchman Teeth with prior endodontic treatment, patients with less time and with radiographic presence of apical periodontitis Patients agreeing for a preoperative and 1 year post operative CBCT scans Lesion size less than 5mm Absence of fenestration of the buccal cortical plate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth with fractures horizontal or vertical Teeth with immature apices Teeth with periodontal involvement Endo Perio Patients with any systemic diseases Teeth with mobility greater than class I Poor restorability Insufficient coronal restoration Resurgery Patients who Are unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The teeth will be assessing clinically for pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion or palpation, sinus or fistula, periodontal probing depth and mobility of tooth. Timepoint: The teeth will be assessing clinically after 1month, 3months, 6months and 1year for pain, swelling, tenderness to percussion or palpation, sinus or fistula, periodontal probing depth and mobility of tooth.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The scoring would be performed to analyse the changes three dimensionally based on the PENN Criteria indexTimepoint: 6 months and 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Srilatha S

M.A.Rangoonwala Dental College and Research Centre

drsri2005@gmail.com9049397929

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026