Comparison of I GEL PROSEAL and BASKA MASK on the basis of efficacy in patient undergoing laproscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia

Comparing The Efficacy OF I-GEL, PROSEAL LMA and BASKA MASK with respect to airway dynamics in patients undergoing laproscopic cholecystectomy under General Anaesthesia. A Randomised Controlled Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/064517

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K806- Calculus of gallbladder and bile duct with cholecystitis Health Condition 2: K800- Calculus of gallbladder with acutecholecystitis

Interventions

Intervention1: comaparing the efficacy of I- gel, Proseal LMA, Baska mask with respect to airway dynamics in patient undergoing laproscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia: there are three

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: the patients with age group 20 to 65 years with BMI between 18.5 to 29.9kg/m2 belonging to ASA grade I and II with mallampati class either I or II undergoing elective laproscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient with anticipated difficult intubation with mouth opening less than 3 cm and thyromental distance less than 6.5cm patient who are pregnant confirmed by urine pregnancy test patient had history of gastric regurgitation had taken treatment in past or on treatment patient having emergency surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the changes in dynamic compliance at different time intervals using I-GEL, proseal, Baska mask in patient undergoing elective laproscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesiaTimepoint: at the time of insertion of device, after 5 mins of insertion of device, at time of pneumoperitoneum, 30 mins after pneumoperitoneum, 5 mins after removal of pneumoperitoneum	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
hemodynamic parametersTimepoint: before insertion of device.;number of attemptsTimepoint: maximum 3 attempts allowed;to compare changes in oropharyngeal leak pressureTimepoint: at the insertion of device, after 5 mins of insertion of device, at pneumoperitoneum, 30 mins after pneumoperitoneum, at 5 min afterr release of pneumoperitoneum;to compare insertion timeTimepoint: time between picking a device and obtaining a proper airway	—

Measure

Time frame

hemodynamic parametersTimepoint: before insertion of device.;number of attemptsTimepoint: maximum 3 attempts allowed;to compare changes in oropharyngeal leak pressureTimepoint: at the insertion of device, after 5 mins of insertion of device, at pneumoperitoneum, 30 mins after pneumoperitoneum, at 5 min afterr release of pneumoperitoneum;to compare insertion timeTimepoint: time between picking a device and obtaining a proper airway

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR Resham Singhal

DR. S.N. MEDICAL COLLEGE

reshamssinghal@gmail.com9649989434

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026