Comparison Of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Spinal Anaesthesia In Patients Posted for Below Umbilical Surgeries In Tertiary Hospital

Ultrasound Versus C arm Fluoroscopic Guided Subarachnoid Block In Patients With Predicted Difficulty For Subarachnoid Block Posted for Infraumbilical Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/064430

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K802- Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis Health Condition 2: N219- Calculus of lower urinary tract, unspecified Health Condition 3: N201- Calculus of ureter Health Condition 4: N813- Complete uterovaginal prolapse Health Condition 5: S720- Fracture of head and neck of femur Health Condition 6: M169- Osteoarthritis of hip, unspecified Health Condition 7: M179- Osteoarthritis of knee, unspecified Health Condition 8: M808- Other osteoporosis with current pathological

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound Guided Subarachnoid block: Ultrasound Guided Subarachnoid block in patients posted for infraumbilical surgeries Intervention2: C-arm Fluoroscopic Guided Subarachnoid Block:

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged between 18-80 years 2. Patients of either sex (Male/Female) 3. American Society of Anaesthesiologist physical status ? and ? 4. Patients scheduled for infraumbilical surgeries under subarachnoid block with BMI = 30kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who refused Subarachnoid Block procedure 2. Patients receiving thromboprophylaxis 3. Patients having Allergy to local anaesthetics 4. Infection at the site of procedure 5. Obstetric population 6. Patients with spina bifida 7. Patients with Aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis, mitral regurgitation 8. Patients with raised intracranial tension 9. Patients with inherited and acquired coagulopathies

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES are 1.To compare the success rate 2.To compare the total procedure time in each technique 3.To compare the number of Needle insertion attempts in each technique Timepoint: 8 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES are 1.To compare the hemodynamic parameters 2.To compare the Patient satisfaction score 3.To compare the complications, if any Timepoint: 8 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

ttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai

drprashant.mishra@yahoo.com0945867706

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026