Skip to content

Exploring the Transformative Effects of Reverse Walking Training on Functional Balance and Gait Velocity in Stroke Survivors

The Impact Of Reverse Walking Training On Functional Balance And Gait Velocity In Individuals With A Diagnosis Of Stroke - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/064402
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-03-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G00-G99- Diseases of the nervous system

Interventions

Intervention1: Reverse walking: Reverse walking, also known as retro-walking or backward walking, involves walking in a direction opposite to the normal forward progression[11]. This form of locomot

Sponsors

SPES Super Speciality Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adults aged 18 years or older. 2. Individuals diagnosed with a stroke, either ischemic or haemorrhagic. 3. The stroke event occurred at least 6 months before the study. 4. Participants with mild to moderate impairments in balance and gait, as determined by standardized assessment tools (e.g., Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go test). 5. Able to walk independently or with minimal assistance (e.g., assistive devices such as canes or walkers). 6. Medically stable and cleared for participation in physical activities by a healthcare professional. 7. Willingness to participate in a structured reverse walking training program for the duration of the study. 8. Ability to follow instructions and provide informed consent for participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Severe cognitive impairments or inability to understand and follow instructions necessary for the reverse walking training program. 2. Severe physical disabilities or comorbidities that prevent participation in physical activities or the reverse walking training program. 3. Uncontrolled medical conditions that may pose a risk during the training program (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, cardiac conditions). 4. Recent history of lower extremity surgery or injury that may affect balance or gait performance. 5. History of other neurological conditions or impairments that may significantly influence balance or gait abilities, independent of the stroke diagnosis. 6. Presence of unhealed wounds or skin ulcers that may be aggravated or worsened during the training program. 7. Pregnancy, as the training program may pose potential risks to the participant and the unborn child. 8. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent for participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Functional Balance Improvement: Measure: Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Criteria: Changes in BBS scores from baseline to post-intervention.Timepoint: baseline, 4 weeks & 8 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Long-Term Effects: Comparison with Conventional Rehabilitation:Implications for Rehabilitation Protocols: Timepoint: baseline, 4 weeks & 8 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShivam Yadav

AMITY UNIVERSITY

Mgupta9@amity.edu918929286943

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026