FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of dwell time between short and long device for accessing veins.

Comparison of Dwell Time between Two Different Peripheral Venous Access Devices - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/064393
Enrollment
15
Registered
2024-03-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: 20G midline catheter: comparison of dwell time between long and short peripheral IV access. Control Intervention1: 20G short peripheral iv access: comparison of dwell time between long

Sponsors

Amrita Institute of Medical Science
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient above 18yrs undergoing major reconstructive surgeries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients in whom venous access in the upper arm are contraindicated 2. Patients needing central venous access due to the complexity of the surgery 3. Patients with evident phlebitis or thrombosis in the veins of the arm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of Dwell Time between Two Different Peripheral Venous Access DevicesTimepoint: For the entire perioperative period—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Insertion success rate 2. Mean procedural time 3. Average catheter duration 4. Catheter failure 5. Cost effectivenessTimepoint: For the entire perioperative period—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Jerry Paul

Amrita Institute of Medical Science, Kochi

drjerrypaul@gmail.com9048699161

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026