Randomised comparison to check efficacy of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block given by using anatomical landmarks versus under Ultrasound guidance in lumbar 2-3 level spine surgeries

A Prospective Randomised Controlled trial comparing efficacy of Free hand Landmark guided versus Ultrasound guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in lumbar 2-3 level spine surgeries - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/064379

Enrollment

130

Registered

2024-03-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 3- Administration Health Condition 2: M488- Other specified spondylopathies

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound guided Bilateral Erector spinae plane block at level of L1 transverse process.: After proning the patient after intubation, under aseptic precautions Ultrasound guided bilate

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing two to three level Lumbar spine surgeries ,Between the age group 18-65 years ,ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists ) status of 1, 2.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Clinically serious cardiovascular disease ,History of allergy to Local Anaesthetics,BMI more than 30,Infection at site of procedure,Inability to use VAS (Visual Analogue Scale),Those with Bleeding disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Post operative VAS score for pain, Total fentanyl usageTimepoint: 3 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time to mobilization, length of hospital stay , quality of recover , satisfaction scoreTimepoint: 3 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAlia Vidyadhara

Manipal hospital , Bangalore

aliadr@gmail.com8095867447

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026