FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative evaluation of 3-D printer assisted surgical planning versus traditional free fibula planning in surgical outcomes in mandibular reconstruction –A prospective study

Comparative evaluation of CAD- CAM planning versus traditional free fibula planning in surgical outcomes in mandibular reconstruction- A prospective study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/064354
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-03-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C00-C14- Malignant neoplasms of lip, oral cavity and pharynx

Interventions

Intervention1: nil: nil Control Intervention1: nil: nil

Sponsors

All India Institute of Medical Sciences,New Delhi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients who requires segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction as primary surgery and willing to follow up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: all patients with peripheral vascular disease, or arteria peronea magna, salvage surgery or h/o trauma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare symmetry and morphometric measurements in CAD-CAM planning versus traditional technique in free fibula planning for mandibular reconstruction.Timepoint: 3 months after surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the functional and aesthetic outcome between two techniques after surgeryTimepoint: 3 months after surgery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAreej Moideen

ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, NEW DELHI

amitchirom@gmail.com09999501928

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026