Effectiveness of Autogenic inhibition versus reciprocal inhibition technique of Muscle Energy Techniques with conventional therapy in neck pain in dental professionals

Effectiveness of Autogenic Inhibition Versus Reciprocal Inhibition with conventional therapy in mechanical neck pain in dental professionals: A Randomised Clinical Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/064348

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Reciprocal Inhibition with conventional therapy: GROUP WILL GET MET TECHNIQUE ( RECIPROCAL INHIBITION ) WITH CONVENTIONAL THERAPY FOR 8 SEC HOLD AND THEN STRETCHNING AT THE END FOR 6 DA

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Dental practitioners aged between 25 to 50 years complaining of neck pain working since at least one year. Working duration of 6-7 hours/day Willing to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of any head / neck injury Complaint with radiculopathy , H/O head and neck surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Verbal analogue scale Timepoint: 1 week	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Neck pain disability index Range of motionTimepoint: 1 week	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMugdha Pendse

KAHER INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOTHERAPY

deeptibagewadi@gmail.com919964608727

Outcome results