Comparison of two types of ceramic replacements for broken front teeth

A Comparative Evaluation between Conventional Ceramic Veneer and Partial Ceramic Veneer for Ellis Class II Restorations - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/064269

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-18

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Partial Ceramic Veneer: For patients with fractured anterior teeth opting for treatment with ceramic veneers, the preparation of finish line will be done just beyond the fracture line.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Ellis Class II fracture in anterior teeth due to trauma. Patients cooperative and willing to return for follow up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Extensive loss of tooth structure due to caries Extensive loss of enamel and pulpal exposure Non vital teeth with periapical pathosis Orofacial deformities eg. cleft lip and palate Severe Malocclusion (eg. CLASS III,OPEN BITE) Parafunctional habits Long term systemic disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
USPHS CRITERIA : Adaptation Colour match Marginal Discolouration Fracture of Restoration Fracture of the tooth Caries Postoperative sensitivity Timepoint: Follow up at intervals of 3, 6, 9 and 12 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Patient satisfactionTimepoint: At the end of 12 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShruthi Rajagopal

Saveetha Dental College And Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences

subash@saveetha.com9884533118

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026