Comparing wound outcome in corrugated rubber drain vs romovac drain in patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy

Comparison of Wound Outcome in Subcutaneous Negative Suction Drain V/S Subcutaneous Corrugated Rubber Drain in Closure Of Midline Incision in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy for Perforation Peritonitis - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/064150

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-14

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K650- Generalized (acute) peritonitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparison of Wound Outcome in Subcutaneous Negative Suction Drain in Closure Of Midline Incision in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy for Perforation Peritonitis: Subcutaneous N

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Perforation peritonitis >18 years of age Consent given

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Midline laparotomy for other conditions, less than 18 years of age, Previous history of laparotomy, Patients with laparostomy, Undergoing re-exploration with in 15 days of surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare Seroma formation, Hematoma and superficial wound dehiscence and need for intervention in both the study groups.Timepoint: 4 weeks after operative day	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare Duration of antibiotic use & hospital stay Timepoint: 4 weeks after operative day	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Radhakrishna Ramchandani

All India Institute of Medical sciences, Raipur

drrramchandani@gmail.com942204224

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026