Comparison between Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine in terms of perfusion index in patients undergoing caesarian section for assesment of hypotension

Comparision of perfusion index following intrathecal administration of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine versus 0.7%heavy ropivacaine in caesarian section patients A randomized double blind study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/064126

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-14

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 3- Administration

Interventions

Control Intervention1: 0.5% Heavy Bupivacain: Dose - 2.2ml Frequency - once Route - Intrathecal(Spinal) Patient undegoing LSCS Control Intervention2: 0.75% Heavy Ropivacain: Dose - 2.2ml Frequency - o

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Prenant patient undergoing LSCS Height 156-165cm ASA Status 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Obstretic Complication Evidence of fetal compromise ASAGrade 3 & 4

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Compare the perfusion index (PI) following the intrathecal administration 2. To compare the number of episode of hypotension taking 3.5 as P.I cut off value.Timepoint: 1. Every 2 min for 20min followed by 2. Evey 5 min for 60min followed by 3. Every 15min for 2houyrs after completion of surgery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NoneTimepoint: None	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Gayatri Mohanty

IMS AND SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orissa

soumyasamal909@gmail.com9439873266

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026