Skip to content

Comparison of Efficacy & Tolerability Of Polyethylene Glycol 4000 Versus Polyethylene Glycol 3350+ Electrolytes for Treatment of excessive stool loading in Children with Functional Constipation

Comparison of Efficacy & Tolerability Of Polyethylene Glycol 4000 Versus Polyethylene Glycol 3350+ Electrolytes For Fecal Disimpaction in Pediatric Functional Constipation: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/063855
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-03-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K590- Constipation

Interventions

Intervention1: Polyethylene glycol (PEG)4000 ARM [PEG 4000 ARM]: PEG 4000 will be administered at a dose of 1.5 gm/kg/day dissolved in water until resolution of fecal impaction or a maximum till 6 day

Sponsors

Institute of Medical sciences (IMS) and SUM Hospitalk
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1-16 years age admitted to the inpatient department 2. Having h/o functional constipation as per ROME IV criteria 3)with Fecal impaction defined as A hard mass in the lower abdomen identified on physical examination or Dilated rectum filled with large amount of stool on per rectal Examination or Excessive stool in the colon on abdominal radiography as determined by a radiologist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients with drug-induced constipation 2) Organic constipation ie, I.Neurological disorders eg. Neural tube defects/cerebral/motor neuron diseases/neuro regression syndromes II.Hirschsprung disease, or anal anomalies III.Known metabolic or endocrine disorders 3) Patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery (except appendectomy) 4) Children with suspected gastrointestinal obstruction 5) Patients taking PEG (either at the time of enrolment or within 2 month before enrolment) 6) Patients receiving medication at enrolment or within 1 month before enrolment influencing gastrointestinal motility function (eg, lactulose, loperamide, cisapride) 7) Known history of Allergy to PEG formulations 8) Patients having comorbidity of any other system like CVS/Respiratory/CNS etc 9)Known case of Chronic kidney disease or history of acute kidney injury in past 3 monthes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The proportion of subjects achieving fecal disimpaction in Each Arm Timepoint: 6 days from allocation of treatment or resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Total no of Days required to achieve fecal disimpaction in each armTimepoint: 6 days from treatment allocation/fecal impaction resolution whichever is earlier;Cumulative PEG dose required for fecal disimpaction in each armTimepoint: 6 days from treatment allocation/fecal impaction resolution whichever is earlier;Proportion of subjects reporting palatability issues in each armTimepoint: 6 days from treatment allocation/fecal impaction resolution whichever is eariler;Proportion of subjects discontinuing the treatment due to palatability issues in each armTimepoint: 6 days from treatment allocation/fecal impaction resolution whichever is earlier

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kalpana Panda

Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS) and SUM Hospital

drkalpanapanda@gmail.com9717133189

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026