Skip to content

Comparison of two different devices to maintain airway during laparoscopic gall bladder removal.

Comparison of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and Baska mask in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia : Randomised control trial. - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/063834
Enrollment
90
Registered
2024-03-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K800- Calculus of gallbladder with acutecholecystitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Baska mask: To compare -ease of insertion -oropharyngeal leak pressure Control Intervention1: Proseal laryngeal mask airway and Baska mask: To compare the ease of insertion and orophary

Sponsors

Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College , Moradabad , Uttar pradesh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I and II , mallampati score 1 and 2 , scheduled to undergo laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia , informed and written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Adult patients with anticipated difficult airway, BMI more than 30kg/m2, high risk of aspiration and pregnancy, operation time more than 4 hours , cervical spine pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome to be assessed 1.To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure in both the groups. 2.To compare ease of insertion in both the groups. Timepoint: 5 minutes,15 minutes, 20 minutes after pneumoperitoneum

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Each participant in the study will be assessed for following Secondary outcome parameters are as follows :- 1.To note the number of attempts of insertion in both the groups. 2.To measure insertion time in both the groups. 3. to note the anatomical alignment of supraglottic device in both the groups. 4.To compare the hemodynamic parameters in both the groups. 5.To assess and compare any complication in both the groups. Timepoint: Will be monitored before insertion of device upto 30 minutes and thereafter every 15 minutes till the completion of surgery.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Simran Saroha

Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College And Research Centre

drpallaviahluwalia@yahoo.com8218628850

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026