To check bond reliability of peek coping with ceramic layering material compared to peek coping layered with composite

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance and In-Vitro Bond Reliability of Differently Surface treated Peek Copings Veneered with Ceramic Versus Composite - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/063769

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Ceramic veneered PEEK: Ceramic veneered PEEK copings surface treated with 50µm alumina particles and 98% sulfuric acid Control Intervention1: Composite veneered PEEK: Composite veneered

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Teeth with no active periodontal or pulpal diseases. 2. Teeth should have antagonist teeth in proper occlusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Poor oral hygiene Partially erupted posterior teeth Maligned or improperly occluding or missing antagonist teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the bond strength of PEEK with ceramic and composite using different surface treatment options by evaluating the fracture rates at different time IntervalTimepoint: To compare the bond strength of PEEK with ceramic and composite using different surface treatment options	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To study the bond strength of PEEK with ceramic and composite using different surface treatment optionsTimepoint: 0,3,6 and 9 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSangeeta

Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences

dr_rekhagupta@yahoo.co.in9654700952

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026