Skip to content

A study to compare the two advanced airway devices for airway management

Comparison of Blockbuster laryngeal mask airway versus Ambu Aura Gain supraglottic airway devices as a conduit for blind endotracheal intubation: A Randomized Study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/063711
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-03-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K802- Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis

Interventions

Control Intervention1: BLOCKBUSTER LMA AND AMBU AURA GAIN SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY: To compare the oropharyngeal leak pressure and number of attempts for successful intubation

Sponsors

Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Center Moradabad Uttar Pradesh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I and II,mallampati score 1 and 2,scheduled for general anaesthesia, informed and written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Adults patients with anticipated difficult airway, BMI more than 30kg/m2,mouth opening less than 2 fingers,mallampati score 3 and 4, limited neck extension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Each participant in the study will be assessed for following primary outcome parameters are as follows:- 1 To note the numbers of attempts for successful intubation in both the groups. 2 To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure in both the groups.Timepoint: 5 minutes 15 minutes 20 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Each participant in the study will be assessed for following secondary outcome parameters are as follows:- 1 To measure insertion time in both the groups 2 To compare the ease of LMA insertion 3 To check Cormack-lehane grading before insertion. 4 To compare the haemodynamic parameters in both the groups. 5 To assess and compare any complication in both the groups.Timepoint: Will be monitored before insertion of device upto 30 minutes and thereafter every 15 minutes till the completion of surgery

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Md Shahbaz alam

Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and research center, Moradabad, Uttar pradesh

drpallaviahluwalia@yahoo.com8218628850

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026