Effect of low flow anaesthesia with two different techniques on attaining steady state. A comparative study.

Comparison of two initiation techiniques of low flow anaesthesia it’s effect on time to reach steady state. A randomised comparative study. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/03/063619

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-05

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Low flow initiation techniques: 1 liter fresh gas flow with 50% n2o and 8% sevoflurane. Control Intervention1: High flow initial techinique: 2 litre fresh gas flow with 50 % n2o and 3%

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I and II who are scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Allergy to sevoflurane ASA III BMI greater than 30

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time to achieve MAC of 1.3 and time to reach steady stateTimepoint: Every 30 sec till 5 minutes after tracheal intubation and every one minute till 15 minutes	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To estimate amount of sevoflurane consumptionTimepoint: At 15 minutes after tracheal intubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr V R Hemanth

Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & RI

drvrhk@gmail.com9003550553

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026