Skip to content

A simple tooth treatment for large caries in which only decayed part of tooth will be removed and healthy part will be preserved

Evaluation of an alternate pulpotomy technique performed in carious permanent mature mandibular molar teeth with symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis: A randomized clinical trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/063506
Enrollment
64
Registered
2024-03-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Alternative Pulpotomy technique: Tooth access opening will be done with high-speed bur under water coolant.Underneath the cariously exposed pulp horn, removal of the coronal pulp tissue

Sponsors

Center for Dental Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects of either gender belonging to 15-35 years of age group with proximal carious lesion on mandibular first and second molar tooth and symptoms suggestive of irreversible pulpitis. Mandibular 1st and 2nd molar teeth with deep caries lesion penetrating =3/4 of the dentine thickness Teeth with Positive response to EPT and cold test Teeth with restorable carious lesions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Teeth with immature roots. Teeth with central pit exposure . Teeth with subgingival extension of proximal caries. Teeth with cracks, cusp fractures, poor periodontal health

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the clinical and radiographic outcome of Alternate Pulpotomy Technique –Underneath the cariously exposed pulp horn, removal of the coronal pulp tissue vertically down to the level of the affected canal orifice, and application of a biomaterial directly onto the radicular pulp tissue (Midi-Pulpotomy) Full pulpotomy –Complete removal of the coronal pulp and application of a biomaterial directly onto the pulp tissue at the level of the root canal orifices. Timepoint: Patients evaluated at baseline; after treatment for 1 week; 3 month and followed up for 6 months and 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the outcome of two techniquesTimepoint: 3, 6 and 12 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAmrita Chawla

All India Institute Of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

dr.amritachawla@gmail.com9871445522

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026