FindTrial
Sign In

A study among the Ear Nose and Throat surgeons to look for their practices and outcomes in removing the temporary tube inserted in the patients wind pipe

Tracheostomy decannulation practices among ENT surgeons and the observed outcomes - a cross sectional study - Nil

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/03/063425
Enrollment
352
Registered
2024-03-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Metal tracheostomy tube: Change to metal tracheostomy tube from cuffed tracheostomy tube before decannulation Intervention2: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: Cuffed tracheostomy tube: De

Sponsors

Jubilee Mission Medical College Research Institute
Lead Sponsor
Jubilee Mission Medical College Research Institute
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Tracheotomy done for a reversible condition and decannulation expected. Tracheostomy done by an experienced consultant who does more than 10 tracheostomies a year.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the success rate between decannulation techniques with and without metal tubes.Timepoint: 12 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Whether there is any difference in the duration from decision to decannulation between the different techniquesTimepoint: 12 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnjali George

Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute

anjalicherish@gmail.com04872432200

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026