Skip to content

To find better method of inserting nasogastric tube in patient under general anaesthesia

Comparison Between Three Methods of Nasogastric Tube Insertion In Patients Under General Anaesthesia –Convential Method, Reverse Sellicks Maneuver, Guedel Airway Guided. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/063192
Enrollment
102
Registered
2024-02-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Shree Krishna Hospital Karamsad
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing elective as well as emergency abdominal, thoracic or any other surgeries where there is a requirement of NGT insertion under general anaesthesia. 2. Patients of either sex, between ages 18-70 year 3. Patient’s Mallampati grade- I,II,III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Presence of any Nasal mass, cleft lip, cleft palate, bleeding diatheses, head and neck surgeries, esophageal stricture and varices, radiotherapy in head and neck region.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
comparison of first attempt success rate of nasogastric tube insertion in a patients under general anesthesia between three methods – Conventional method reverse Sellick’s menoeuvre and Guedel airway guided.Timepoint: Observed 6 months period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) Total Procedure time for successful NGT insertion 2) Adverse events -bleeding, coiling, kinking requiring use of laryngoscopy and Magills forceps Timepoint: 3min

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR PANKAJKUMAR VADHER

Shree Krishna Hospital Karamsad Anand

pankajvadher.55@gmail.com7283887929

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026