Skip to content

Comparison of wide size implant and normal size implant for extracted teeth

A SPLIT MOUTH STUDY: ULTRA WIDE DIAMETER (8.0 TO 9.0 MM) POST- EXTRACTIVE IMPLANTS VS DELAYED PLACEMENT OF NORMAL- DIAMETER IMPLANTS (4.5 TO 5.0 MM) IN THE MOLAR REGION: 1 YEAR POST-LOADING OUTCOME. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/063150
Enrollment
13
Registered
2024-02-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Immediate placement Ultra-wide diameter (8-9mm) implant in post-extractive socket: Under local anaesthesia, non- restorable molar with poor prognosis is extracted atraumatically while p

Sponsors

Ekta Kumari
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Healthy patient at least 18 years requiring post extractive immediate wide implant. There also had to be sufficient bone to allow the placement of immediate implant of at least 8mm long and a diameter of 8mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. General contraindication to implant surgery 2. Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised 3. Irradiation in the head or neck area 4. Uncontrolled diabetes 5. Pregnancy or lactation • Untreated periodontitis • Poor oral hygiene and motivation • Addiction to alcohol or drugs • Psychiatric disorders • Unrealistic expectations • Acute infections (abscess) in the sites intended for implant placement • Necessity to lift the maxillary sinus epithelium • Unable to commit to 3- year follow up post- loading • Under treatment or had previous treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates •Lack of bony wall completely surrounding the implant •Participation in other studies that interfere with present protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The level of marginal bone surrounding immediate implant is better than the conventional implant in healed ridgeTimepoint: The level of marginal bone surrounding immediate implant is measured at 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pink esthetic score . Pink esthetic score which has the evaluation of mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue contour, texture, & soft tissue deficiencies will be better in intervention groupTimepoint: 1 year

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactEKTA KUMARI

Faculty of Dental Sciences, IMS, BHU

durranif88@gmail.com9335873366

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026