Skip to content

To compare the effect of a protocol driven electrical stimulation therapy on recovery of foot drop in patients with stroke in comparison to standard electrical stimulation therapy. -A randomized controlled trial.

Effectiveness of protocol driven Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) using in-house developed electrical stimulator (Re-lift) in comparison to standard NMES therapy on recovery of ankle dorsiflexors in patients with foot drop following stroke. -A randomized controlled trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2024/02/062894
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-02-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I679- Cerebrovascular disease, unspecified Health Condition 2: G968- Other specified disorders of central nervous system

Interventions

Intervention1: Protocol driven NMES: This protocol will include contralaterally controlled NMES(CCNMES) with bilateral ankle dorsiflexion activity as shown below: o A total of 5 sessions which will i

Sponsors

Internal Fluid Research Grant Christian Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Adults with stroke with foot-drop. -Duration of stroke -Ankle dorsiflexor MRC scale -Ankle passive dorsiflexion range upto 10 degrees

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Any contraindication for ES like implants, seizure disorder -If the subject has ankle contracture or if cause for foot drop is LMN lesion. -Any local lesions preventing use of the device like deep vein thrombosis or ulcer. -Severe cognitive/ language/ behavior impairment. -Medically unstable

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assess mean difference in Fugl Meyer assessment scale for lower limb extremity pre & post 3 weeks of therapy.Timepoint: Assess mean difference in Fugl Meyer assessment scale for lower limb extremity at 0 weeks and at 3 weeks post intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
MRC grading for ankle motor recovery at 3 weeks & 3 months MAS grading at 3 weeks and 3 months for ankle Range of motion of ankle 10 metre walk test at 3 weeks and 3 months Parameters from Instrumented Gait analysis (Spatio-temporal parameters barefoot walking, kinematic, EMG) at 3 weeks and 3 months Timepoint: MRC grading for ankle motor recovery at 3 weeks & 3 months MAS grading at 3 weeks and 3 months for ankle Range of motion of ankle 10 metre walk test at 3 weeks and 3 months Parameters from Instrumented Gait analysis (Spatio-temporal parameters barefoot walking, kinematic, EMG) at 3 weeks and 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHenah Meshack Gunaraj

Christian Medical College

judy@cmcvellore.ac.in9789331514

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026