To ascertain the users experience with the simplicity and success of placing three supraglottic airway devices (I-gel, LMA protection, and Ambu- aura gain)

A study to evaluate the ease and success of placement of three supraglottic airway devices(I-gel, LMA protector, Ambu- aura gain) compared with operator’s experience. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2024/02/062892

Enrollment

Registered

2024-02-20

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: R198- Other specified symptoms and signsinvolving the digestive system and abdomen

Interventions

Intervention1: Placement of iGel, will be compared with LMA Protector and ambu aura Gain during induction of anaesthesia: 1.Time taken for placement of SAD 2.Ease of placement of SAD 3.Number of atte

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 90 patients of either gender in the age group 18-60 yrs belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I and II scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Ease and success of placemnt of supraglottic devices compared with operators experience.Timepoint: Ease and success of placemnt of supraglottic devices compared with each other	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Operator experience affecting haemodynamic changes after device insertion.Timepoint: immediately after insertion, 5 minute after insertion	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Arjun G

Pt BD Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

goodarjune@gmail.com9688732834

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026